<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Differential Geometry on Haifei's Home</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/tags/differential-geometry/</link><description>Recent content in Differential Geometry on Haifei's Home</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</managingEditor><webMaster>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</webMaster><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 01:13:18 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://haifei.pro/en/tags/differential-geometry/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Dirac Magnetic Monopoles—Chern Classes and Chern Numbers [Higher and More Wonderful Electrodynamics · 4]</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250330_%E7%8B%84%E6%8B%89%E5%85%8B%E7%A3%81%E5%8D%95%E6%9E%81%E5%AD%90-%E9%99%88%E7%B1%BB%E4%B8%8E%E9%99%88%E6%95%B0-%E6%9B%B4%E9%AB%98%E6%9B%B4%E5%A6%99%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-4/</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 01:13:18 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250330_%E7%8B%84%E6%8B%89%E5%85%8B%E7%A3%81%E5%8D%95%E6%9E%81%E5%AD%90-%E9%99%88%E7%B1%BB%E4%B8%8E%E9%99%88%E6%95%B0-%E6%9B%B4%E9%AB%98%E6%9B%B4%E5%A6%99%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-4/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Previous article in this series:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/32173040413" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreffer "&gt;Godfly: The electromagnetic field is more than just electric and magnetic fields—The AB effect and Berry connection [Higher and More Wonderful Electrodynamics · 3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/32173040413" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreffer "&gt;previous article&lt;/a&gt;, we mentioned that if a manifold is topologically trivial, then integrating the Berry curvature over a closed surface \(\Sigma\) should yield zero. This is because, according to Stokes&amp;rsquo; theorem:&lt;/p&gt;
\[\int_\Sigma F = \int_{\partial \Sigma } A = 0\]&lt;p&gt;However, on a topologically nontrivial manifold, the integral \(\int_\Sigma F\) need not be zero. This is because a globally single-valued connection \(A\) cannot be defined in this case, so Stokes&amp;rsquo; theorem no longer applies. What does this mean?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Electromagnetic Field Is More Than Just Electric and Magnetic Fields—The AB Effect and Berry Connection [Higher and More Elegant Electrodynamics · 3]</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250323_%E7%94%B5%E7%A3%81%E5%9C%BA%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%AA%E6%98%AF%E7%94%B5%E5%9C%BA%E5%92%8C%E7%A3%81%E5%9C%BA-ab%E6%95%88%E5%BA%94%E4%B8%8Eberry%E8%81%94%E7%BB%9C-%E6%9B%B4%E9%AB%98%E6%9B%B4%E5%A6%99%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-3/</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2025 20:20:44 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250323_%E7%94%B5%E7%A3%81%E5%9C%BA%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%AA%E6%98%AF%E7%94%B5%E5%9C%BA%E5%92%8C%E7%A3%81%E5%9C%BA-ab%E6%95%88%E5%BA%94%E4%B8%8Eberry%E8%81%94%E7%BB%9C-%E6%9B%B4%E9%AB%98%E6%9B%B4%E5%A6%99%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-3/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Previous article in this series:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/23958176393" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreffer "&gt;Godfly: Electrodynamics from the Perspective of Gauge Field Theory [Higher and More Elegant Electrodynamics · 2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The electromagnetic field is not simply the electric field and the magnetic field.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In other words, the electromagnetic field is more than just the electric field and the magnetic field.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What does this mean?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="1-electromagnetic-potentials-have-a-higher-status-than-field-strengths"&gt;1. Electromagnetic Potentials Have a Higher Status Than Field Strengths&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a &lt;a href="https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/23958176393" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreffer "&gt;previous article&lt;/a&gt;, we left a question open:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Is the Invariance of Differential Forms?</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250321_%E5%BE%AE%E5%88%86%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%98%E6%80%A7%E6%98%AF%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 22:49:13 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250321_%E5%BE%AE%E5%88%86%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%98%E6%80%A7%E6%98%AF%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="what-is-the-invariance-of-differential-forms"&gt;What Is the Invariance of Differential Forms?&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to textbooks, the invariance of differential forms means that, under a change of variables, the form of a differential equation remains unchanged. That is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If, when \(\mathrm{d}y\) in \(y\) denotes the function \(y=f(x)\) and \(x\) in \(\mathrm{d}x\) denotes the function \(\phi(x)=x\), \(\mathrm{d}y=a\mathrm{d}x\) holds, that is, \(\mathrm{d}f=a\mathrm{d}\phi\) holds,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;then, when \(y\) in \(\mathrm{d}y\) denotes the function \(y=g(t)\) and \(x\) in \(\mathrm{d}x\) denotes the function \(x=\varphi(t)\), \(\mathrm{d}y=a\mathrm{d}x\) likewise holds, that is, \(\mathrm{d}g=a\mathrm{d}\varphi\) holds.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Electrodynamics from the Perspective of Gauge Field Theory [Higher and More Elegant Electrodynamics · 2]</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250217_%E8%A7%84%E8%8C%83%E5%9C%BA%E8%AE%BA%E8%A7%86%E8%A7%92%E4%B8%8B%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-%E6%9B%B4%E9%AB%98%E6%9B%B4%E5%A6%99%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:15:55 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250217_%E8%A7%84%E8%8C%83%E5%9C%BA%E8%AE%BA%E8%A7%86%E8%A7%92%E4%B8%8B%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-%E6%9B%B4%E9%AB%98%E6%9B%B4%E5%A6%99%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you have not yet read the previous article, please see:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/21808352165" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreffer "&gt;Electrodynamics from the Perspective of Differential Geometry [Higher and More Elegant Electrodynamics · 1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article uses many concepts from the previous article, so please make sure you have read it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article continues to use the metric convention of \((-,+,+,+)\).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why is electrodynamics a gauge field theory?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To understand what this statement means, we must first understand what electrodynamics is and what gauge field theory is.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Electrodynamics from the Perspective of Differential Geometry [Higher and More Elegant Electrodynamics · 1]</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250207_%E5%BE%AE%E5%88%86%E5%87%A0%E4%BD%95%E8%A7%86%E8%A7%92%E4%B8%8B%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-%E6%9B%B4%E9%AB%98%E6%9B%B4%E5%A6%99%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-1/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 22:55:58 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250207_%E5%BE%AE%E5%88%86%E5%87%A0%E4%BD%95%E8%A7%86%E8%A7%92%E4%B8%8B%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-%E6%9B%B4%E9%AB%98%E6%9B%B4%E5%A6%99%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-1/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="preface"&gt;Preface&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may have heard that Maxwell&amp;rsquo;s equations have a very simple form:&lt;/p&gt;
\[\begin{aligned} \mathrm{d} F&amp;=0 \\ \mathrm{d} \star F &amp;= \mu_0 \star J \end{aligned}\]&lt;p&gt;Or alternatively,&lt;/p&gt;
\[\begin{aligned} \partial_\mu (\star{F})^{\mu \nu}&amp;= 0 \\ \partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu}&amp;= \mu_0 J^\nu \end{aligned}\]&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note: Strictly speaking, \(\mathrm{d}F=0\) (or \(\partial_\mu (\star{F})^{\mu \nu}= 0\)) is not part of the dynamical equations of the electromagnetic field, but rather part of the field&amp;rsquo;s own structure. This is because \(\mathrm{d}F=0\) follows from the definition of the field strength \(F=\mathrm{d}A\).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What is the relationship between Lie derivative and covariant derivative?</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20230715_%E6%9D%8E%E5%AF%BC%E6%95%B0%E4%B8%8E%E5%8D%8F%E5%8F%98%E5%AF%BC%E6%95%B0%E6%9C%89%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E8%81%94%E7%B3%BB/</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2023 16:52:03 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20230715_%E6%9D%8E%E5%AF%BC%E6%95%B0%E4%B8%8E%E5%8D%8F%E5%8F%98%E5%AF%BC%E6%95%B0%E6%9C%89%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E8%81%94%E7%B3%BB/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="i-differences-and-similarities-in-properties"&gt;I. Differences and Similarities in Properties&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lie derivative $\mathcal{L}_V$ and covariant derivative $\nabla_V$ share many common points:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Both $\mathcal{L}_V$ and $\nabla_V$ preserve the type of tensors, mapping $\mathcal{T}^p_q(M)$ to $\mathcal{T}^p_q(M)$. $\mathcal{T}^p_q(M)$ represents the set of all smooth tensor fields of type (p, q) on $M$.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Particularly, for (0,0) type tensor fields, i.e., scalar fields $f\in \mathcal{F}(M)$, we have $\mathcal{L}_V f=\nabla_V f=Vf$.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol start="2"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Both satisfy linearity and the Leibniz rule:&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;$ \begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}_V(\mu A + \lambda B) &amp;amp;= \mu \mathcal{L}_V A + \lambda \mathcal{L}_V B, \\ \mathcal{L}_V (A \otimes B) &amp;amp;= (\mathcal{L}_V A)\otimes B + A \otimes (\mathcal{L}_V B) \end{aligned} $&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>An Introduction to Differential Geometry (Physics Version)</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20230516_%E4%B8%80%E6%96%87%E5%85%A5%E9%97%A8%E5%BE%AE%E5%88%86%E5%87%A0%E4%BD%95-%E7%89%A9%E7%90%86%E4%BA%BA%E7%89%88/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 21:27:19 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20230516_%E4%B8%80%E6%96%87%E5%85%A5%E9%97%A8%E5%BE%AE%E5%88%86%E5%87%A0%E4%BD%95-%E7%89%A9%E7%90%86%E4%BA%BA%E7%89%88/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="preface"&gt;Preface&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a physics student, you have probably heard of one or more of the concepts tensor, differential form, exterior algebra, connection/curvature, and so on. But, like me, you may feel completely lost whenever you hear these concepts. This article therefore aims to help physics students organize these closely interconnected ideas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The structure of this article is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a. In Chapter 1, we introduce the stage on which physics takes place: differentiable manifolds, and define scalar fields on manifolds.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding the Invariance of Differential Forms</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20210216_%E5%AF%B9%E5%BE%AE%E5%88%86%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%98%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%90%86%E8%A7%A3/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:23:58 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20210216_%E5%AF%B9%E5%BE%AE%E5%88%86%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%98%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%90%86%E8%A7%A3/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;21/03/2025: Major revision of this article&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="what-is-the-invariance-of-differential-forms"&gt;What Is the Invariance of Differential Forms?&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to textbooks, the invariance of differential forms means that, under a change of variables, the form of a differential equation remains unchanged. That is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If, when \(\mathrm{d}y\) in \(y\) denotes the function \(y=f(x)\) and \(\mathrm{d}x\) in \(x\) denotes the function \(\phi(x)=x\), \(\mathrm{d}y=a\mathrm{d}x\) holds, that is, \(\mathrm{d}f=a\mathrm{d}\phi\) holds,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;then, when \(\mathrm{d}y\) in \(y\) denotes the function \(y=g(t)\) and \(\mathrm{d}x\) in \(x\) denotes the function \(x=\varphi(t)\), \(\mathrm{d}y=a\mathrm{d}x\) likewise holds, that is, \(\mathrm{d}g=a\mathrm{d}\varphi\) holds.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Is a Differential?</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20210215_%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E5%BE%AE%E5%88%86/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 21:44:54 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20210215_%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E5%BE%AE%E5%88%86/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="i-is-a-differential-an-infinitesimal"&gt;I. Is a Differential an Infinitesimal?&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Physicists like to regard a differential as a very small quantity. This is always convenient in calculations, but it gives one a feeling of imprecision.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact, it is indeed imprecise; the second mathematical crisis arose for this reason.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rigor and accessibility are forever complementary. Regarding a differential as an infinitesimal caters to intuitive sensibilities, yet cannot pass rational scrutiny.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id="ii-a-differential-is-a-linear-function"&gt;II. A Differential Is a Linear Function&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I prefer to think of a differential (at a certain point) as a machine. For example,&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>