<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>General Relativity on Haifei's Home</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/tags/general-relativity/</link><description>Recent content in General Relativity on Haifei's Home</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</managingEditor><webMaster>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</webMaster><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:08:10 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://haifei.pro/en/tags/general-relativity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Gauge-Field Connections vs. Connections in General Relativity [Higher and More Elegant Electrodynamics · Extra 1]</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250729_%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E8%81%94%E7%BB%9C-%E6%9B%B4%E9%AB%98%E6%9B%B4%E5%A6%99%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-%E7%95%AA%E5%A4%96%E7%AF%87-1/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:08:10 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250729_%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E8%81%94%E7%BB%9C-%E6%9B%B4%E9%AB%98%E6%9B%B4%E5%A6%99%E7%9A%84%E7%94%B5%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B%E5%AD%A6-%E7%95%AA%E5%A4%96%E7%AF%87-1/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In a &lt;a href="https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/23958176393" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreffer "&gt;previous article&lt;/a&gt;, we said that the electromagnetic field is a connection. This led many readers to think of the connection in general relativity. What are the differences and commonalities between these two kinds of connections?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The electromagnetic connection \(A\) is a connection on a principal bundle, whereas the general-relativistic connection \(\Gamma\) is a connection on a vector bundle. Their definitions appear to be quite different. Is there a way to relate them?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Are Christoffel Symbols Tensors After All?</title><link>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250427_%E5%85%8B%E6%B0%8F%E7%AC%A6%E5%88%B0%E5%BA%95%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E6%98%AF%E5%BC%A0%E9%87%8F/</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2025 23:12:31 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei.pro/en/post_20250427_%E5%85%8B%E6%B0%8F%E7%AC%A6%E5%88%B0%E5%BA%95%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E6%98%AF%E5%BC%A0%E9%87%8F/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;My favorite way to understand this is to regard $\Gamma$ as a connection on the frame bundle. Then, the transformation law of the Christoffel symbols&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;$\boxed{ \begin{aligned} \bar{\Gamma}^i_{\mu j} = \frac{\partial \bar{x}^i}{\partial x^k}\frac{\partial x^l}{\partial \bar{x}^j} \frac{\partial x^\nu}{\partial \bar{x}^\mu} \Gamma^k_{\nu l} \color{red}{ + \frac{\partial \bar{x}^i}{\partial x^k} \frac{\partial^2 x^k}{\partial x^\mu \partial \bar{x}^j}} \end{aligned} }$&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;is nothing more than a gauge transformation:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;$\boxed{ \bar{A} = g^{-1}A g \color{red}{+ g^{-1} \mathrm{d}g} }$&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The extra inhomogeneous term $ g^{-1} \mathrm{d}g$ is inherently part of a gauge transformation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>